iterating bit-by-bit across int?
Brian Kelley
bkelley at wi.mit.edu
Thu Oct 23 16:07:32 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Oct 23 16:07:32 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): iterating bit-by-bit across int?
- Next message (by thread): iterating bit-by-bit across int?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Rubin wrote: > Matthew Wilson <mwilson at sarcastic-horse.com> writes: > >>I'm playing around with genetic algorithms and I want to write a >>function that mutates an integer by iterating across the bits, and about >>1 in 10 times, it should switch a zero to a one, or a one to a zero. >> >>I'm not sure how many bits are inside a python integer. The library >>reference says at least 32. > > > Long ints can have as many bits as you want. Such as -1L which has an infinite number of bits. I have used a list of integers as my defacto standard for representing a stream of bits. On my windows box this is slower than using a long integer but with psyco running (psyco.sourceforge.net) it is faster than the long integer implementation. It also is faster to bail out on a comparison, for example if (a&b)!= 0: can be optimized to fail on the first integer failure, it doesn't have to complete the operation as it would with a long integer. This is useful when seeing if a bit string is contained inside another bit string.
- Previous message (by thread): iterating bit-by-bit across int?
- Next message (by thread): iterating bit-by-bit across int?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list