bool v. int distinctions
Michael Geary
Mike at DeleteThis.Geary.com
Sun Oct 12 11:09:23 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Oct 12 11:09:23 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): bool v. int distinctions
- Next message (by thread): bool v. int distinctions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lee Harr wrote: > I am wondering if this is a reasonable thing to do: > > class Pinger: > def go(self, repeat=False): > if repeat is True: > repeat = -1 > elif repeat is False: > repeat = 1 > self.repeat = repeat > self.ping() > > def ping(self): > while self.repeat: > print 'ping!' > if self.repeat > 0: > self.repeat -= 1 > > Won't work with 2.1, clearly, but it seems ok in a > recent 2.2 or in 2.3. > > I guess my only qualm is that > > p = Pinger() > p.go(repeat=0) > > may be a bit confusing, since it will not ping at all... > > What do you think? I think the specification and test cases are missing. :-) It is a bit unclear what you intend the code to do. What parameter types and values can be passed to Pinger.go()? Is Pinger.ping() intended to be called externally, or is it just an internal method used by Pinger.go()? Why is this a class at all instead of just a function? If you write out an exact specification, and write the test cases to go with that, then it should become clear whether it's confusing or not. -Mike
- Previous message (by thread): bool v. int distinctions
- Next message (by thread): bool v. int distinctions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list