Why don't people like lisp?
Edi Weitz
edi at agharta.de
Mon Oct 20 06:10:24 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Oct 20 06:10:24 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
- Next message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 20 Oct 2003 12:29:39 +0300, Ville Vainio <ville.spammehardvainio at spamtut.fi> wrote: > Edi Weitz <edi at agharta.de> writes: > > > Yeah, sure. And 95% of all computer users use Windows so it must > > be the best OS. You know the "50 million flies" saying? > > Yep, but when exposed to a clearly superior language, one might > assume that at least a part of the students would get the clue and > keep on using it after the course. As the OP wrote, most of these students are taught Scheme, not Common Lisp. (And, as we have seen quite often on c.l.l., probably by teachers who force them to use weird recursive constructs and tell stories about Lisp - "it is slow, it is interpreted, ..." - that have been obsolete for decades.) Also, where do you see evidence that /all/ students dismiss Lisp immediately? We have a constant (albeit small) influx of newbies on c.l.l. As a counter-example consider the courses Robert Strandh teaches in France (Bordeaux?) - they seem to be very successful. He's teaching Common Lisp and some of his students "got the clue." They even implemented a perfectly usable window manager in Common Lisp during the course.[1] Edi. [1] <http://common-lisp.net/project/eclipse/> The website is mostly empty but you can download the software and also subscribe to the mailing list.
- Previous message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
- Next message (by thread): Why don't people like lisp?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list