AI and cognitive psychology rant (getting more and more OT - tell me if I should shut up)
Anton Vredegoor
anton at vredegoor.doge.nl
Sun Oct 26 08:56:59 EST 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Oct 26 08:56:59 EST 2003
- Previous message (by thread): AI and cognitive psychology rant (getting more and more OT - tell me if I should shut up)
- Next message (by thread): AI and cognitive psychology rant (getting more and more OT - tell me if I should shut up)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robin Becker <robin at jessikat.fsnet.co.uk> wrote: >What we humans call 'reality' is completely determined by our senses and >the instruments we can build. How we interpret the data is powerfully >influenced by our social environment and history. As an example the >persistence of material objects is alleged by some to be true only for >small time scales <10^31 years; humans don't have long enough to learn >that. Persistence of material objects will become obsolete much sooner. See: http://crnano.org/systems.htm This discusses three ethical systems and their usefulness for dealing with the coming nanotechnology era. The articles conclusion has quite a Pythonic ring to it, I feel. However just like Python, it will have to give up on backward compatibility someday :-) Anton
- Previous message (by thread): AI and cognitive psychology rant (getting more and more OT - tell me if I should shut up)
- Next message (by thread): AI and cognitive psychology rant (getting more and more OT - tell me if I should shut up)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list