Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme
Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters
mertz at gnosis.cx
Sat Oct 4 16:12:53 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Oct 4 16:12:53 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme
- Next message (by thread): Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex Martelli <aleax at aleax.it> wrote previously: |> >>> def foo(i, accum=[0]): |> ... accum[0]+=i |> ... return accum[0] |...cannot just instantiate multiple independent accumulators |Making a cookie, and making a cookie-cutter, are quite different True... just like there's a difference between a function and a function factory (it's quite a close analogy, really): >>> def foofactory(start): ... def foo(i, accum=[start]): ... accum[0]+=i ... return accum[0] ... return foo >>> x = foofactory(7) >>> y = foofactory(2) >>> x(1) 8 >>> y(2) 4 >>> x(2) 10 But that's pretty close to what a couple other people have suggested. Yours, Lulu... -- Keeping medicines from the bloodstreams of the sick; food from the bellies of the hungry; books from the hands of the uneducated; technology from the underdeveloped; and putting advocates of freedom in prisons. Intellectual property is to the 21st century what the slave trade was to the 16th.
- Previous message (by thread): Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme
- Next message (by thread): Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list