Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
prunesquallor at comcast.net
prunesquallor at comcast.net
Fri Oct 24 18:35:21 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Oct 24 18:35:21 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
- Next message (by thread): Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dirk Thierbach <dthierbach at gmx.de> writes: > Yep. It turns out that you take away lots of bogus programs, and the > sane programs that are taken away are in most cases at least questionable > (they will be mostly of the sort: There is a type error in some execution > branch, but this branch will never be reached), and can usually be > expressed as equivalent programs that will pass. I don't understand why you think that most of them will be `dead code'. I don't understand why a smart type checker would complain about dead code.
- Previous message (by thread): Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
- Next message (by thread): Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list