Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme
David Eppstein
eppstein at ics.uci.edu
Sun Oct 12 17:14:25 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Oct 12 17:14:25 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme
- Next message (by thread): Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <mailman.38.1065990895.2192.python-list at python.org>, Rob Hunter <rob at cs.brown.edu> wrote: > > Wow! This is the clearest argument against macros I have seen yet. > > > > These are -exactly- the kinds of difficulties I want to exist before > > the > > syntax of my programming language can be changed--it should need > > committment, effort, and clear and arguable reasons... not be something > > someone can cavalierly do on an impulse. > > Let's just all code in assembly. I shouldn't be able to make a > recursive call on an impulse. It'll be really slow going and so we'll > have to think really hard about each line and thus are programs will > come out better. Uh, actually every assembly language I have seen has had macros. -- David Eppstein http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/ Univ. of California, Irvine, School of Information & Computer Science
- Previous message (by thread): Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme
- Next message (by thread): Python syntax in Lisp and Scheme
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list