tuples vs lists
Peter Hansen
peter at engcorp.com
Wed Sep 17 09:32:15 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Sep 17 09:32:15 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): tuples vs lists
- Next message (by thread): tuples vs lists
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ivan Voras wrote: > > Peter Hansen wrote: > > Ivan Voras wrote: > > >> I know that. I was just wandering if they also behave faster. Lists > >> are only interesting to me in case I need mutability. > > > > I'd suggest you have that backwards. Lists should _always_ be > > interesting > > to you. Tuples should be interesting only in the case where you need > > *immutability*. > > I disagree. :) I would always use tuples except when I explicitely need > mutability. That doesn't meen that I would intentionaly (badly) restructure > code just to use tuples, only that in many cases my structures don't need to > be modified. That's your personal choice, I suppose, and I won't try any more to dissuade you any more except to point out that most Python programmers, I believe, do not see tuples as their first choice, but use them only in certain special cases. I could be wrong. It happens. ;-) -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): tuples vs lists
- Next message (by thread): tuples vs lists
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list