[OT] Top posting is a PITA [was : Prothon Prototypes vs Python Classes]
Ed Cogburn
edcogburn at hotpop.com
Thu Apr 1 06:46:13 EST 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Apr 1 06:46:13 EST 2004
- Previous message (by thread): [OT] Top posting is a PITA [was : Prothon Prototypes vs Python Classes]
- Next message (by thread): [OT] Top posting is a PITA [was : Prothon Prototypes vs Python Classes]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
R Baumann wrote: > one follows the "standard" of the newsgroup one is participating in. No such thing, since there is no way to enforce these "standards", and the bottom-posters will always bottom post, and the top-posters will always top post no matter where they are. > Complaining whether one top posts or bottom posts is just a waste of > time, and you, me, we, all know it. Not always, sure there are the smart asses who top-post just to annoy people, but a lot of top-posters do that because they are newbies and don't know that it annoys so many people. Often they just need to find out how to change their reader program's default, or simply discover that their reader does have such an option. > this is more irritating than whether one is "posting in the approved manner". No it isn't, as long as someone sticks "OT" in the subject line, I don't mind anyone talking about something else. If its identified as off topic, I can always skip it. Top-posting on the other hand, is annoying because its unnatural for most of us. Most of us may not say anything, and most of the time its not "serious", but IMO, top-posting is far more irritating then OT posts. > This thread was renamed to a different subject, but that was a > half-dozen rants later in the thread than it needed to be. Why complain about this when you're obviously still participating in this thread two *dozen* posts after "OT" was inserted? > Get my point? Naw, too much to expect. I've wasted both your time and my > time with my own rant against your rants. :-) Yep, everyone has their pet peeve, but isn't it kinda obvious by now that there are a *lot* more people peeved about top-posting than there are peeved at OT posts. :) > A lot of you guys seem far more interested in starting arguments and keeping > them running, than you are discussing the pros and cons of Python and > providing helpful answers. Rein in your egos, no one, and I include myself, > has anything helpful to contribute in this kind of "dust-up". I've seen this complaint a thousand times too, and it never makes a difference. You're basically asking people to stop being human, which is why we designated "OT" as a warning for others that the conversation has drifted far afield. However, we never did adopt "TP" so top-posters could warn others, mainly because top-posting is not seen as inevitable, irresistible human behavior, it is of course simply an example of laziness (or ignorance), nothing more. While laziness is inevitable in some humans, its still not accepted behavior. People arguing with one another is perfectly natural, and has been going on for millenia, but for most of the world, its written conversations are done top-to-bottom, not bottom-to-top.
- Previous message (by thread): [OT] Top posting is a PITA [was : Prothon Prototypes vs Python Classes]
- Next message (by thread): [OT] Top posting is a PITA [was : Prothon Prototypes vs Python Classes]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list