Is Perl *that* good? (was: How's ruby compare to it older brother python)
Cameron Laird
claird at lairds.com
Mon Apr 26 13:26:37 EDT 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Apr 26 13:26:37 EDT 2004
- Previous message (by thread): Is Perl *that* good? (was: How's ruby compare to it older brother python)
- Next message (by thread): Is Perl *that* good? (was: How's ruby compare to it older brother python)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <knbjc.267$id.3998 at news2.e.nsc.no>, Leif B. Kristensen <junkmail at solumslekt.org> wrote: . . . >which can be spelled in an amazing number of different ways. As I found >that the Soundex algorithm was useless for Norwegian spellings, I >invented my own. It's not really an algorithm, but a series of >substitutions that reduces names to a kind of primitives. Thus, eg. . . . "Canonicalization" is one name in academic English for this transformation. -- Cameron Laird <claird at phaseit.net> Business: http://www.Phaseit.net
- Previous message (by thread): Is Perl *that* good? (was: How's ruby compare to it older brother python)
- Next message (by thread): Is Perl *that* good? (was: How's ruby compare to it older brother python)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list