Confused about pep 318
Christopher T King
squirrel at WPI.EDU
Thu Aug 5 15:42:41 EDT 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Aug 5 15:42:41 EDT 2004
- Previous message (by thread): Confused about pep 318
- Next message (by thread): Confused about pep 318
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Terry Reedy wrote: > "Christopher T King" <squirrel at WPI.EDU> wrote in message > news:Pine.LNX.4.44.0408051249050.10473-100000 at ccc6.wpi.edu... > > That thread reaches no consensus, > > To me this is evasion. Well, it is. > >That's because it was. ... > >There had previously been no public discussions about it. > > You (agreeing with Steven) made a false accusation of something like > dastardliness. Just admit your mistake and move on. (More evasion:) +10 points for using the word "dastardliness" in a sentence. +10 more for using it legitimately in a post on a computer language mailing list. > >other than, in his sole post in the thread, Guido stating > >"I would love to see an implementation of this idea." > > Hence, I was not surprised to see it in an alpha as an experimental feature > which might or might not stay. Indeed, I was comforted by a recent post of Guido's in python-dev: When I let Anthony check it in for 2.4a2, the plan was to see how it fares in a2 and a3, and possibly take it out in 2.4b1. I was afraid that going in so close to 2.4b1, @ was in for good, but knowing they may yet come out is good.
- Previous message (by thread): Confused about pep 318
- Next message (by thread): Confused about pep 318
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list