[Python-Dev] PEP 318: Can't we all just get along?
Andrew Durdin
adurdin at gmail.com
Thu Aug 19 01:57:57 EDT 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Aug 19 01:57:57 EDT 2004
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 318: Can't we all just get along?
- Next message (by thread): speed
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:55:06 +1200, Greg Ewing <greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > Guido: > > > Is anybody seriously trying to come up with a single alternative > > decorator proposal that most folks "out there" can support, to be > > presented to me (with implementation, please!) in time for 2.4b1? > > >From the posts I've seen here, the only alternatives that have > considerable popular support are ones that you've already rejected. So > I suspect nobody really feels it's worth trying. To expand on that just a bit: the two alternatives that were most generally favoured (in Doug Holton's estimate) were the "list-after-def" (C1 in the wiki), and the "pie decorator at top of function body" (E1 in the wiki), both of which Guido rejected. In the poll that Doug ran, E1 had a slight margin over C1: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2004-August/233479.html However, C1 has an implementation, while E1 doesn't. (Aside: how difficult would it be to create an implementation of E1?)
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 318: Can't we all just get along?
- Next message (by thread): speed
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list