How about "pure virtual methods"?
Fredrik Lundh
fredrik at pythonware.com
Sun Dec 19 11:38:42 EST 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Dec 19 11:38:42 EST 2004
- Previous message (by thread): How about "pure virtual methods"?
- Next message (by thread): How about "pure virtual methods"?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jp Calderone wrote: > If the line immediately before "someobj.bar()" is "someobj = FooType()", > this will surely be easy. If someobj is instantiated further away, then > more digging is required. well, I guess I was assuming that you're debugging your own code, and that you don't generally write a large piece of code, but don't run it before you've been on a long vacation... (if you tend to do that, or have someone on your team who does, all bets are off). </F>
- Previous message (by thread): How about "pure virtual methods"?
- Next message (by thread): How about "pure virtual methods"?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list