while 1 vs while True
Raymond Hettinger
vze4rx4y at verizon.net
Tue Dec 14 05:15:04 EST 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Dec 14 05:15:04 EST 2004
- Previous message (by thread): while 1 vs while True
- Next message (by thread): while 1 vs while True
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Dan Bishop wrote: > >>Out of pure curiousity, > >>Why wasn't 'While True' optimized also? > > > > > > Probably has something to do with "True" and "False" not being > > constants. [Nick Coghlan] > Yup. Even 'None' only just became a constant in 2.4. > > I don't know if 'True' and 'False' are in line for similar treatment (there are > obvious backwards compatibility issues in doing so). It is unlike to before Py3.0. Making them constants would break the reams of compatability code: True, False = (1==1), (1!=1). Raymond Hettinger
- Previous message (by thread): while 1 vs while True
- Next message (by thread): while 1 vs while True
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list