Parallelization with Python: which, where, how?
Michael Hoffman
m.h.3.9.1.without.dots.at.cam.ac.uk at example.com
Mon Dec 20 18:31:56 EST 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Dec 20 18:31:56 EST 2004
- Previous message (by thread): Parallelization with Python: which, where, how?
- Next message (by thread): Parallelization with Python: which, where, how?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mathias wrote: > I have a (pretty much) "emberassingly parallel" problem and look for the > right toolbox to parallelize it over a cluster of homogenous linux > workstations. We have a >1000-node cluster here and use the commercial Platform LSF to manage it. My Poly package <http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~hoffman/software/poly/> makes that trivial to use from Python and also avoids many of the pitfalls of programming farms that large, such as accidental distributed denial of service attacks on your own fileserver ;) Due to the cost and difficulty of setup, LSF is probably not what you want, or you would already have it. But MPI is probably not what you want if you are doing embarassingly parallelizable problems. I would look into OpenPBS <http://www.openpbs.org/>. If you want to write a Poly plugin for OpenPBS, I would be happy to accept it. ;) -- Michael Hoffman
- Previous message (by thread): Parallelization with Python: which, where, how?
- Next message (by thread): Parallelization with Python: which, where, how?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list