Qt/PyQt license confusion
Paul Rubin
http
Thu Feb 5 01:21:22 EST 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Feb 5 01:21:22 EST 2004
- Previous message (by thread): Qt/PyQt license confusion
- Next message (by thread): Qt/PyQt license confusion
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leif K-Brooks <eurleif at ecritters.biz> writes: > > If you /use/ a piece of GPL'd software to create 'something else', > > and the 'something else' gets distributed, you have used the GPL'd > > software as a tool - and are /not required/ to license your > > 'something else' with the GPL. > > No, I'm pretty sure you would have to GPL your software then > too. Isn't that the difference between the GPL and LGPL? I think he's talking about a different situation than using GPL'd code in your application. I read it as "Editing your program with GNU Emacs doesn't mean you then have to distribute the program under the GPL."
- Previous message (by thread): Qt/PyQt license confusion
- Next message (by thread): Qt/PyQt license confusion
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list