super. could there be a simpler super?
Kristian Ovaska
kristian.ovaska at helsinki-nospam.fi.invalid
Thu Jan 15 07:00:33 EST 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Jan 15 07:00:33 EST 2004
- Previous message (by thread): super. could there be a simpler super?
- Next message (by thread): super. could there be a simpler super?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kerim Borchaev <warkid at hotbox.ru>: > Is it possible that such a "super"(deducing class method declaration > context) could appear in Python? > (It seems to me that to implement a simple super something should be > done during "compilation" of class declaration.) The document "Unifying types and classes in Python 2.2" by Guido probably answers your question. Quote from http://www.python.org/2.2.3/descrintro.html#cooperation regarding super: "It would be nice if we didn't have to name the class explicitly, but this would require more help from Python's parser than we can currently get. I hope to fix this in a future Python release by making the parser recognize super." -- Kristian Ovaska - http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/hkovaska/en/
- Previous message (by thread): super. could there be a simpler super?
- Next message (by thread): super. could there be a simpler super?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list