Lists, tuples and memory.
Arthur
ajsiegel at optonline.com
Fri Jul 16 10:03:13 EDT 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Jul 16 10:03:13 EDT 2004
- Previous message (by thread): Lists, tuples and memory.
- Next message (by thread): Lists, tuples and memory.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:52:53 -0400, Christopher T King <squirrel at WPI.EDU> wrote: > > >1) Stick with lists. Tuples are meant to be used not really as immutable >lists, but as a way to group related items of different types. e.g. the >sequence 'apple','orange','pear','banana' should be stored in a list, >whereas the group of related items 'apple','red',3,5 (presumably >describing an apple in some predefined manner, say, >fruit,color,width,height) should be stored in a tuple. At least that's >what Guido wants us to do. ;) But with Fletcher's confession of sticking with tabs ... its anarchy out there. > >2) Assuming you're using a newer version of Python, try using a list >comprehension instead of map(). It's a little bit cleaner, and will >probably be a bit faster too: Faster is good. Modern and progessive governance. The tax incentive concept at work. Art
- Previous message (by thread): Lists, tuples and memory.
- Next message (by thread): Lists, tuples and memory.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list