Why '==' ??
Fuzzyman
michael at foord.net
Wed Mar 31 02:19:14 EST 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Mar 31 02:19:14 EST 2004
- Previous message (by thread): Why '==' ??
- Next message (by thread): Why '==' ??
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Tim Peters" <tim.one at comcast.net> wrote in message news:<mailman.124.1080662765.20120.python-list at python.org>... > [John Roth] > > I believe the earliest versions of Python did use the single equal > > sign for comparisons. I don't know why Guido changed it, but > > it might be in order to keep his options open. > > It was to stop ambiguity. This was especially acute at an interactive > shell, where guessing what > > >>> x = y > > intended often guessed wrong <wink> (it's common to wonder whether two > things are equal at a shell prompt). After the change, that became obvious: > > >>> x = y # assignment > >>> x == y # equal? > False > >>> Despite *all* that... The lines if a = 3 print 'Yeah baby' are still *unambiguous*.... yet the interpreter refuses to understand you...... Theres no reason why a single '=' shouldn't be understood in a conditional.... As for needing a ':' to allow statements after a 'def' or a conditional.... python already has the ';' for that... why insist on a ':' Regards, Fuzzy http://www.voidspace.org.uk/atlantibots/pythonutils.html
- Previous message (by thread): Why '==' ??
- Next message (by thread): Why '==' ??
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list