Package name with '.' in them: Python Bug ?
Josiah Carlson
jcarlson at nospam.uci.edu
Sat Mar 20 05:04:19 EST 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Mar 20 05:04:19 EST 2004
- Previous message (by thread): Package name with '.' in them: Python Bug ?
- Next message (by thread): Package name with '.' in them: Python Bug ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Well, I wrote one (it's generated names, that's why it happenned) ;) That doesn't make it a good idea. If it wasn't clear, I meant that of the thousands of Python source files I've seen, I've never seen any named with a dot. Probably because they don't work correctly, as you have found. You didn't answer my question as to whether module_5.py is reasonable replacement for the module.5.py naming scheme you are currently using. >> Considering that you have shown that it does not work, and that there >> is documentation stating that it is not /meant/ to work > > The doc is not so explicit. It says that hierarchical modules are not > handled by load_module(), fine, i dont want to handle hierarchicals one, > just a simple one that has a don in its name. The documentation is specific, you quoted it yourself: "This function does not handle hierarchical module names (names containing dots)." Any file name with a dot that is not the extension of the file, is considered hierarchical, and is "not handled". >> then the error is in the way /you/ name /your/ modules, not the way >> Python handles /incorrectly/ named modules. > > That's exactly what I said, and I tend to believe it. Then you agree that your naming scheme is flawed. Stop doing it. - Josiah
- Previous message (by thread): Package name with '.' in them: Python Bug ?
- Next message (by thread): Package name with '.' in them: Python Bug ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list