Is there a consensus on how to check a polymorphic instance?
Dan Perl
danperl at rogers.com
Tue Nov 23 14:55:54 EST 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Nov 23 14:55:54 EST 2004
- Previous message (by thread): Is there a consensus on how to check a polymorphic instance?
- Next message (by thread): protocols, inheritance and polymorphism
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Donn Cave" <donn at u.washington.edu> wrote in message news:donn-910064.10130823112004 at gnus01.u.washington.edu... > Not only are there many definitions of polymorphism, there are > several kinds of polymorphism, each with many definitions. You > could spend some time with a web search engine and get lots of > reading material on this, and I think you would find that a good > deal of it is coming from a point of view that kind of tends to > ignore object oriented programming altogether. Check it out. > If you want to stay with the more immediately relevant OOP > thinking on this, search for polymorphism and smalltalk. > > Note that C++ and Java need two mechanisms in support of something > approximating parametric polymorphism. The subtype polymorphism > I think you're thinking of is the classic OO device, but it doesn't > support really generic functions and types. The template system > has been bolted onto these languages (I gather Java has one now) > for this purpose. With these two mechanisms, they more or less > support parametric polymorphism, in a statically typed, compiled > language. Python is not statically typed, of course, so where > the literature about parametric polymorphism focuses on types > you have to decide for yourself how important that is in principle. > In the end it of course doesn't really matter what you call it. Yes, you are right, subtype polymorphism is what I had in mind and I was implicitly questioning on the acceptance of 'polymorphism' as one type or the other, even though I was not aware of the formal separation between the two types. Having learned of polymorphism years ago in the C++ and Java context where it was used only the sense of subtype polymorphism, it was still the way I interpreted the term in the subject line of this thread. >From now on I will keep in mind the more general meaning of parametric polymorphism. Dan > Donn Cave, donn at u.washington.edu
- Previous message (by thread): Is there a consensus on how to check a polymorphic instance?
- Next message (by thread): protocols, inheritance and polymorphism
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list