Are multiple return values really harmful? (Re: determining the number of output arguments)
Dave Brueck
dave at pythonapocrypha.com
Wed Nov 17 16:54:00 EST 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Nov 17 16:54:00 EST 2004
- Previous message (by thread): Are multiple return values really harmful? (Re: determining the number of output arguments)
- Next message (by thread): Are multiple return values really harmful? (Re: determining the number of output arguments)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Donn Cave wrote: > In article <mailman.6491.1100708505.5135.python-list at python.org>, > Dave Brueck <dave at pythonapocrypha.com> wrote: > >>Greg Ewing wrote: >> >>>Jeremy Bowers wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Generally, returning a tuple is either a sign that your return value >>>>should be wrapped up in a class, or the function is doing too much. >>> >>> >>>While I suspect you may be largely right, I >>>find myself wondering why this should be so. >> >>*Is* it largely right? I don't think so. As you said, there doesn't seem to be >>anything "wrong" with passing multiple pieces of data _into_ a function, so why >>should we assume that complex data passing should be so one way? > > > What's up with keyword arguments, then? I don't think you can argue > that on one hand keyword arguments are a valuable feature, but plain > by-order tuples are a totally satisfactory interface on the other hand. I don't think anybody is putting forth the opinion that by-order tuples are totally satisfactory. I just disagree that returning a tuple is generally a sign of something wrong with your function. -Dave
- Previous message (by thread): Are multiple return values really harmful? (Re: determining the number of output arguments)
- Next message (by thread): Are multiple return values really harmful? (Re: determining the number of output arguments)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list