Is there a "Large Scale Python Software Design" ?
Andreas Kostyrka
andreas at kostyrka.org
Tue Oct 19 15:08:51 EDT 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Oct 19 15:08:51 EDT 2004
- Previous message (by thread): Is there a "Large Scale Python Software Design" ?
- Next message (by thread): Is there a "Large Scale Python Software Design" ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 07:16:01AM -0700, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > Testing is good; preventing entire classes of errors from ever > happening at all is better, particularly when you get large. Avoiding > connectedness helps, but that's not always possible. What classes of errors are completely avoided by "static typing" as implemented by C++ (Java)? Just out of curiosity, because this is usually stated as "true by axiomatic definition" in this kind of discussions. Andreas
- Previous message (by thread): Is there a "Large Scale Python Software Design" ?
- Next message (by thread): Is there a "Large Scale Python Software Design" ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list