unittest: new reporting category "skipped"
Remy Blank
remy.blank_asps at pobox.com
Thu Sep 23 11:11:32 EDT 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Sep 23 11:11:32 EDT 2004
- Previous message (by thread): unittest: new reporting category "skipped"
- Next message (by thread): unittest: new reporting category "skipped"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roy Smith wrote: > Having just completed a project which required testing as root, I can > sympathize with you completely! If at all possible, try to avoid > getting painted into that particular corner. > > Is it possible that by building the appropriate test scaffolding, you > could run the tests as a normal user? For example, let's say the reason > you need to be root is because you are reading a file which is mode 600. > You could then do something like this: (snip) > It's not always possible or practical to do that, but it's worth > thinking about. Yes, well, the whole idea of my project (which I'll call mockfs) is to provide a framework to do exactly that. However, for it to be useful, it has to behave as closely as possible as an original filesystem. So the idea was to write a test suite that can be run either on the real filesystem (in a chroot environment), or on the mock filesystem. Both should pass identically. And for running it on the real filesystem, well, you need to be root for some tests. -- Remy Remove underscore and suffix in reply address for a timely response.
- Previous message (by thread): unittest: new reporting category "skipped"
- Next message (by thread): unittest: new reporting category "skipped"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list