Home Original page

up with PyGUI!

Carlos Ribeiro carribeiro at gmail.com
Sun Sep 26 00:40:04 EDT 2004 
On 26 Sep 2004 04:15:57 GMT, Bengt Richter <bokr at oz.net> wrote:
> I could see a way to write this in terms of instances. Also playing a trick so that keyword
> arg CC=True would return a custom class instead of an instance, for repeated use of a
> particular customization:
> 
> CustButtton = Button(CC=True, bgcolor='lightgreen', namefmt='cbtn%s', nextnameno=100)
> CustistBox = ListBox(CC=True, kind=ListBox.DROPDOWN, width=40, maxdrop=10) # default namefmt is cls.__name__+'%s'
> 
> myFrame = (
>   Frame(
>     Sizer(
>       CustButton(size= ... etc),
>       CustButton(size= ... etc),
>       Panel(
>         Sizer(
>           CustListBox(etc),
>           CustListBox(etc),
>           CustButton(etc),
>           Text( etc )
>         )
>       )
>     )
>   )
> )
> 

It may sound like a silly excuse, but this sequence of closing
parenthesis is as unpythonic as it could be :-) In practice, it does
keep some of the proposed advantages of our little class creation
system. In theory, it's still different, because it's imperative, not
declarative. Is it a big difference? Maybe it doesn't sum up to
anything that big. I really don't know -- I'm still inclined to work
with the class declaration as a better, more concise and consistent
way to do what I want. But I concede that I'm lacking good arguments
-- it's more a 'hunch' than something that I can really argue about.
For now, it's more about "trust me, it will work" than anything
else...

-- 
Carlos Ribeiro
Consultoria em Projetos
blog: http://rascunhosrotos.blogspot.com
blog: http://pythonnotes.blogspot.com
mail: carribeiro at gmail.com
mail: carribeiro at yahoo.com
More information about the Python-list mailing list