Xah Lee's Unixism
CBFalconer
cbfalconer at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 9 15:41:04 EDT 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Sep 9 15:41:04 EDT 2004
- Previous message (by thread): Xah Lee's Unixism
- Next message (by thread): Xah Lee's Unixism
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
jmfbahciv at aol.com wrote: > CBFalconer <cbfalconer at yahoo.com> wrote: > ... snip ... >> >> There is no need, nor cause, to impute Bush & Co. with >> intrinsically evil intentions. It is quite enough to point to >> their lack of capability, and bull headed 'revenge for daddy' >> propensities. The state of the economy, unemployment, poverty >> rate, medical care, deficit, death rate in Iraq (both of Americans >> and Iraqis), abandonment of the Bin Laden hunt, abridgement of >> civil liberties (as in the Patriot Act and the Gitmo gulag), poor >> choice of companions (Halliburton and other political donors and >> trough feeders, and the 'plausible deniability' of the Swiftboat >> gang), irritation of allies, inability to deal with North Korea >> (due to involvement with useless adventures), abandonment of >> efforts towards a Palestinian peace, all spring to immediate mind. > > Well, your Bush-hater campaign is working beyond all your > expectations. One day, you will have to live it. But the point is that most people neither love nor hate Bush. They hate his misguided and thoughtless actions. The comics love him, as he provides so many ridiculous quotes. The wealthy love him, as he transfers taxes from them to the middle class and the poor. Bin Laden loves him, as he provides manna for his rabble rousing. The NRA loves him, as he blocks any renewal of gun laws. Halliburton loves him. >> >> Yes, we have had no experience with a Kerry administration, > > OH, fuckmeverymuch. I am in Mass. We do have some > experience of a Kerry administration. For those you who don't, > watch how he runs his campaign. He will run the country in the > same manner. No, you have experience of a Senate career. The famous war votes show that he is responsible, since he voted for a bill that provided for financing, and against a modified bill that simply ran up the deficit. At the time very few knew that the alleged Sadamian sins were largely pipe dreams, that the hunt for the 9/11 perpetrators was to be discarded, and that no preparation for the results was to be made. His major error was in placing some trust in the Bush administration. The post Viet Nam episodes show that he has a functioning conscience. Some people learn from their mistakes. Bush is a much different thing. With him you had experience of a Governorship in a state that almost totally emasculates the power of a Governor, apart from the ability to sign death warrants and deny mercy. We have seen the ugly result of giving him some power, as I partially enumerated above. > >> .. but we >> have had far too much experience with a Bush administration. > ... snip adhominem garbage ... > Things can be worse..a lot worse. True. But those candidates aren't running for President this time. -- "Churchill and Bush can both be considered wartime leaders, just as Secretariat and Mr Ed were both horses." - James Rhodes. "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals. We now know that it is bad economics" - FDR
- Previous message (by thread): Xah Lee's Unixism
- Next message (by thread): Xah Lee's Unixism
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list