print with no newline
Jp Calderone
exarkun at divmod.com
Fri Sep 3 10:54:03 EDT 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Sep 3 10:54:03 EDT 2004
- Previous message (by thread): print with no newline
- Next message (by thread): print with no newline
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Watson wrote: > "Jp Calderone" <exarkun at divmod.com> wrote in message > news:mailman.2834.1094220495.5135.python-list at python.org... > >>Paul Watson wrote: >> >>>I thought that using a comma at the end of a print statement would > > suppress > >>>printing of a newline. Am I misunderstanding this feature? How can I > > use > >>>print and not have a newline appended at the end? >>> >> >> Print doesn't want to leave the *final* line without a newline. >>sys.stdout.write() doesn't care if your shell prompt gets mixed in with >>the last line of output. You'll need to use the latter if that's what >>you want. >> >>exarkun at boson:~$ python -c "import sys; sys.stdout.write('here')" >>hereexarkun at boson:~$ >> >> Jp > > > Ok, I can use sys.stdout.write(). Still, this comma at the end thing does > not seem very consistent. Before the last line, while it does suppress the > newline, a space is still added to the output. Why is that? Yes, I have > seen spaces added between items in the print statement and, while it is > probably convenient at times, is frequently an annoyance. Basically, print is only meant to help people new to the language get started ;) It often does what will make life easiest for someone who is just getting into things, but which is otherwise confusing, expected, special-casey, or otherwise undesirable. I mean, the whole existence of the keyword "print" is an inconsistency, right? One could quite reasonably expect print to be a function. Jp
- Previous message (by thread): print with no newline
- Next message (by thread): print with no newline
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list