Xah Lee's Unixism
CBFalconer
cbfalconer at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 9 15:41:01 EDT 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Sep 9 15:41:01 EDT 2004
- Previous message (by thread): OT: Authoritarian Control (was: Xah Lee's Unixism)
- Next message (by thread): Xah Lee's Unixism
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chuck Dillon wrote: > ... snip ... > > It's easy to say we *don't* need but not so easy to demonstrate. > You don't even offer a hand wave attempt at articulating an > alternative. In the political world everything is subject to > debate. Taking the war to the middle east, increasing policing > powers, increasing intelligence capabilities... But in the real > world there is a huge threat and action must be taken. Must it? I am not claiming that it must not, but that the matter deserves more thought than a panic reaction. The very first thing to settle should be the objectives. Then the means and costs of achieving such can be considered. -- "Churchill and Bush can both be considered wartime leaders, just as Secretariat and Mr Ed were both horses." - James Rhodes. "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals. We now know that it is bad economics" - FDR
- Previous message (by thread): OT: Authoritarian Control (was: Xah Lee's Unixism)
- Next message (by thread): Xah Lee's Unixism
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list