Why not FP for Money?
Paul Rubin
http
Fri Sep 24 19:42:41 EDT 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Sep 24 19:42:41 EDT 2004
- Previous message (by thread): Why not FP for Money?
- Next message (by thread): Why not FP for Money?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
aleaxit at yahoo.com (Alex Martelli) writes: > You're probably right, but it will be nice to be able to point the > querants to module decimal. Backwards incompatible changes, such as > taking a literal of 1.1 to mean a decimal rather than a float, are not > in the cards until Python 3.0 time That kind of change (without a top-of-file declaration like "import __decimal__") sounds a bit extreme even for 3.0. However, adding a backwards-compatible syntax ("a = 1.1d"), or a declaration to read all literals like 1.1 as decimal, seems ok to consider.
- Previous message (by thread): Why not FP for Money?
- Next message (by thread): Why not FP for Money?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list