check for unused ports and then grab one
Barry Margolin
barmar at alum.mit.edu
Mon Sep 13 21:36:45 EDT 2004
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Sep 13 21:36:45 EDT 2004
- Previous message (by thread): check for unused ports and then grab one
- Next message (by thread): check for unused ports and then grab one
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <9vhh12-suo.ln1 at lairds.us>, claird at lairds.us (Cameron Laird) wrote: > In article <mailman.3268.1095108346.5135.python-list at python.org>, > Erik Heneryd <erik at heneryd.com> wrote: > >Brad Tilley wrote: > >> Instead of me arbitrarily assigning a high port number to a variable, is > >> it possible to check for ports that are unused and then randomly assign > >> one of them to a variable? > > > >No. Trial and error until you find one. > . > . > . > Incorrect, if I understand you both; *UNIX Network Programming* > has said for years that > The process can let the system automatically assign > a port. For both the Internet domain and the XNS > domain, specifying a port number of 0 before calling > bind() requests the system to do this. > While I've never tracked down an RFC that specifies this, it surely > exists. There's no reason for it to be in an RFC, because it's an API issue, not a protocol issue. -- Barry Margolin, barmar at alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
- Previous message (by thread): check for unused ports and then grab one
- Next message (by thread): check for unused ports and then grab one
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list