Paul Rubin http
Sat Sep 25 04:47:43 EDT 2004

• Previous message (by thread): Why not FP for Money?
• Next message (by thread): Why not FP for Money?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Andrew Dalke <adalke at mindspring.com> writes:
> I'm against adding new literals.  There hasn't been
> one added since complex in ... must have been the
> mid-1990s.

Boolean literals were added just a few months ago.

---

• Previous message (by thread): Why not FP for Money?
• Next message (by thread): Why not FP for Money?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list