Problem with Lexical Scope
Duncan Booth
duncan.booth at invalid.invalid
Mon Dec 12 08:02:35 EST 2005
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Dec 12 08:02:35 EST 2005
- Previous message (by thread): Problem with Lexical Scope
- Next message (by thread): Problem with Lexical Scope
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
jslowery at gmail.com wrote: > reducer does have no side effects so I suppose short-circuting it would > be the best thing. I think the only thing about the last example is > that it starts things off with a zero. I think that would boink it. In that case, and assuming that fields contains at least one entry: def collect(fields, reducer): def rule(record): f = iter(fields) prev = record[f.next()] for field in f: if not reducer(prev, record[field]): return False prev = record[field] return True return rule
- Previous message (by thread): Problem with Lexical Scope
- Next message (by thread): Problem with Lexical Scope
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list