Courageous dontwant at spam.com
Sun Feb 13 19:04:24 EST 2005

• Previous message (by thread): Kill GIL
• Next message (by thread): Kill GIL
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

>Actually, this is one of the cases I was talking about. I find it
>saner to convert to non-blocking I/O and use select() for
>synchronization. That solves the problem, without introducing any of
>the headaches related to shared access and locking that come with
>threads.

Threads aren't always the right entity for dealing with asynchronicity,
one might say.

C//

---

• Previous message (by thread): Kill GIL
• Next message (by thread): Kill GIL
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list