rbt rbt at athop1.ath.vt.edu
Sun Feb 20 08:36:13 EST 2005

• Previous message (by thread): How to wrap a class's methods?
• Next message (by thread): How to wrap a class's methods?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Jeff Shannon wrote:
> You could probably also do this as a factory function, rather than as a 
> class (also untested!):
> 
> def Wrapper(func):
>     def wrapped(self, *args, **kwargs):
>         s, r = func(self, *args, **kwargs)
>         if s != 'OK':
>             raise NotOK((s,r))
>         return r
>     return wrapped
> 
> I believe that this will be semantically almost equivalent, but 
> conceptually slightly simpler.
> 
> Jeff Shannon

This is a nice example. I have used sub-functions (functions within 
functions) recently with some code, but I've wondered how proper it is 
to do this. Is this type of thing frowned upon?

---

• Previous message (by thread): How to wrap a class's methods?
• Next message (by thread): How to wrap a class's methods?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list