map vs. list-comprehension
Roy Smith
roy at panix.com
Thu Jun 30 21:31:37 EDT 2005
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Jun 30 21:31:37 EDT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): map vs. list-comprehension
- Next message (by thread): map vs. list-comprehension
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Terry Hancock <hancock at anansispaceworks.com> wrote: > One of the strengths of Python has been that the language itself is > small (which it shares with C and (if I understand correctly, not being > a lisp programmer?) Lisp), but with all the syntax enhancements going > on, Python is getting pretty complicated. I have to wonder if new users > won't begin to find it just as intimidating as Perl or other big > languages. +1 Even some of the relatively recent library enhancements have been kind of complicated. The logging module, for example, seems way over the top. Look at what happened to C when it mutated into C++. In isolation, most of the features of C++ seem like good ideas. Taken together, it's a huge hairy mess that most people only understand increasingly larger subsets of. Fred Brooks called it the second system syndrome.
- Previous message (by thread): map vs. list-comprehension
- Next message (by thread): map vs. list-comprehension
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list