Idle bytecode query on apparently unreachable returns
Neal Norwitz
nnorwitz at gmail.com
Sun Oct 9 22:01:25 EDT 2005
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Oct 9 22:01:25 EDT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): Idle bytecode query on apparently unreachable returns
- Next message (by thread): Idle bytecode query on apparently unreachable returns
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tom Anderson wrote: > Evening all, > > Here's a brief chat with the interpretator: [snip] > What puzzles me, though, are bytecodes 17, 39 and 42 - surely these aren't > reachable? Does the compiler just throw in a default 'return None' > epilogue, with routes there from every code path, even when it's not > needed? If so, why? I think the last RETURN_VALUE (None) isn't thrown in unless there is some sort of conditional the precedes it as in this example. As to why: it's easier and no one has done anything about fixing it. If you (or anyone else) are interested, the code is in Python/compile.c. Search for the optimize_code() function. n
- Previous message (by thread): Idle bytecode query on apparently unreachable returns
- Next message (by thread): Idle bytecode query on apparently unreachable returns
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list