Nested function scope problem
Antoon Pardon
apardon at forel.vub.ac.be
Fri Aug 4 11:12:44 EDT 2006
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Aug 4 11:12:44 EDT 2006
- Previous message (by thread): Nested function scope problem
- Next message (by thread): Nested function scope problem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2006-08-04, Slawomir Nowaczyk <slawomir.nowaczyk.847 at student.lu.se> wrote: > On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 10:10:45 -0300 > Gerhard Fiedler <gelists at gmail.com> wrote: > > #> You can hardly claim that what gets printed is the "id" of the variable c. > #> (Well, you can claim, but few C programmers would follow you.) > > That's possible. I wouldn't expect too many C programmers to have any > notion of "id of a variable". I, for example, never thought about such > thing before this thread. But even in Python we don't speak of "id of a variable". It is not the variable that has an id. It is the object that is currently attached to the variable that has an id. Yes we can use "id of a variable" as a shortcut for the correct formulation as long as you keep in mind that it is not the variable itself that has an id. -- Antoon Pardon
- Previous message (by thread): Nested function scope problem
- Next message (by thread): Nested function scope problem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list