A.T.Hofkamp hat at se-126.se.wtb.tue.nl
Wed Oct 11 10:55:55 EDT 2006

• Previous message (by thread): sufficiently pythonic code for testing type of function
• Next message (by thread): sufficiently pythonic code for testing type of function
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 2006-10-11, Bruno Desthuilliers <onurb at xiludom.gro> wrote:
>
> Now the real question : what if the object is not an instance of any of
> the types, but still support the expected interface ?
>

one possible answer: Use ZopeInterfaces
(and ask objects 'do you implement interface X' rather than 'are you type Y')

Not sure what options you have when dealing with builtin data types however.


Albert

---

• Previous message (by thread): sufficiently pythonic code for testing type of function
• Next message (by thread): sufficiently pythonic code for testing type of function
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list