Theerasak Photha hanumizzle at gmail.com
Wed Oct 11 01:53:38 EDT 2006

• Previous message (by thread): sufficiently pythonic code for testing type of function
• Next message (by thread): sufficiently pythonic code for testing type of function
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 10/11/06, Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam at benfinney.id.au> wrote:

> Why have you re-implemented (a less-functional version of) 'isinstance'?

Ignorance, I think. But the issue is resolved now. Thank you.

http://www.stanford.edu/~spqrsyc/crew/crew%20-%20ignorance.gif

"It's amazing how much easier it is for a team to work together when
no one has any idea where they're going" :)

-- Theerasak

---

• Previous message (by thread): sufficiently pythonic code for testing type of function
• Next message (by thread): sufficiently pythonic code for testing type of function
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list