Home Original page

Static linking of python and pyqt

BlueBird phil at freehackers.org
Thu Dec 20 03:56:34 EST 2007 
On Dec 19, 1:26 pm, Markus Dahlbokum <dahlbo... at intes.de> wrote:
> > > I just want the qt libs linked to the interpreter without accessing them
> > > by a module. I tried the configure option '--with-libs='lib ...''. The
> > > make did fine but the executable is too small and the qt symbols are not
> > > known by it. How can I just link qt statically?
>
> > Why do you want to do this? If qt isn't actually *used* in Python (as
> > you don't include the pyqt modules), what effect do you expect from
> > such linking?
>
> > I think it linked just fine - it just didn't include any symbols,
> > because none were needed. That is the correct, expected behavior.
> > It all worked fine.
>
> > Regards,
> > Martin
>
> I need an environment that can be delivered to our customers without
> installing python, qt and pyqt. We want to provide the complete package.
> In order to do so I need to link at least python and qt. How can this be done?
>
> Of course a complete package with python, qt and pyqt would be the best
> solution but there seem to be even more complications that way. If you can
> help me with this I would be very grateful.

If it's for windows, py2exe works like a charm for this kind of setup.

For windows + linux, you might one to try one of:
http://www.freehackers.org/Packaging_a_python_program
More information about the Python-list mailing list