Is a "real" C-Python possible?
Aahz
aahz at pythoncraft.com
Thu Dec 13 21:40:16 EST 2007
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Dec 13 21:40:16 EST 2007
- Previous message (by thread): Is a "real" C-Python possible?
- Next message (by thread): Is a "real" C-Python possible?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <mailman.2374.1197592941.13605.python-list at python.org>, Christian Heimes <lists at cheimes.de> wrote: >Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> >> I'm not quite sure I understand that criticism. How is that different >> from things which are not properties? >> >> foo.baz = 2 # oops, I meant bar >> >> will succeed regardless of whether foo.bar is an attribute or a property. > >Unless it's a new style class with __slots__ [....] Naw, I'll skip the rant this time. ;-) -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "Typing is cheap. Thinking is expensive." --Roy Smith
- Previous message (by thread): Is a "real" C-Python possible?
- Next message (by thread): Is a "real" C-Python possible?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list