Static linking of python and pyqt
Markus Dahlbokum
dahlbokum at intes.de
Wed Dec 19 07:26:51 EST 2007
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Dec 19 07:26:51 EST 2007
- Previous message (by thread): Static linking of python and pyqt
- Next message (by thread): Static linking of python and pyqt
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > I just want the qt libs linked to the interpreter without accessing them > > by a module. I tried the configure option '--with-libs='lib ...''. The > > make did fine but the executable is too small and the qt symbols are not > > known by it. How can I just link qt statically? > > Why do you want to do this? If qt isn't actually *used* in Python (as > you don't include the pyqt modules), what effect do you expect from > such linking? > > I think it linked just fine - it just didn't include any symbols, > because none were needed. That is the correct, expected behavior. > It all worked fine. > > Regards, > Martin I need an environment that can be delivered to our customers without installing python, qt and pyqt. We want to provide the complete package. In order to do so I need to link at least python and qt. How can this be done? Of course a complete package with python, qt and pyqt would be the best solution but there seem to be even more complications that way. If you can help me with this I would be very grateful. Thank you in advance. Markus
- Previous message (by thread): Static linking of python and pyqt
- Next message (by thread): Static linking of python and pyqt
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list