Performance on local constants?
Paddy
paddy3118 at googlemail.com
Sat Dec 22 06:56:43 EST 2007
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Dec 22 06:56:43 EST 2007
- Previous message (by thread): Performance on local constants?
- Next message (by thread): Performance on local constants?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Dec 22, 10:53 am, William McBrine <wmcbr... at users.sf.net> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm pretty new to Python (a little over a month). I was wondering -- is > something like this: > > s = re.compile('whatever') > > def t(whatnot): > return s.search(whatnot) > > for i in xrange(1000): > print t(something[i]) > > significantly faster than something like this: > > def t(whatnot): > s = re.compile('whatever') > return s.search(whatnot) > > for i in xrange(1000): > result = t(something[i]) > > ? Or is Python clever enough to see that the value of s will be the same > on every call, and thus only compile it once? > > -- > 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 -- pass it on Python RE's do have a cache but telling it to compile multiple times is going to take time. Best to do as the docs say and compile your RE's once before use if you can. The timeit module: http://www.diveintopython.org/performance_tuning/timeit.html will allow you to do your own timings. - Paddy.
- Previous message (by thread): Performance on local constants?
- Next message (by thread): Performance on local constants?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list