Is a "real" C-Python possible?
Kay Schluehr
kay.schluehr at gmx.net
Tue Dec 11 01:49:37 EST 2007
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Dec 11 01:49:37 EST 2007
- Previous message (by thread): Is a "real" C-Python possible?
- Next message (by thread): Improvements to the Python core (was: Is a "real" C-Python possible?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> We obviously need more effort to make Python more efficient for CPU > bound tasks. Particularly JIT compilation like Java, compilation like > Lisp or data specialization like Psyco. Given that the Python core team has been mostly silent about JIT compilation and Armin Rigos work in particular which started 5 years ago ( Psyco will not be promoted towards Python 3.0 and there is no indication that anyone but Armin would maintain Psyco ) I wonder about this sudden insight. But maybe you can tell us more when you work on such stuff for CPython yourself? Given your status in the core Python team this would have a chance of not being just a loosely coupled independent project as almost all the interesting stuff that happens around Python these days.
- Previous message (by thread): Is a "real" C-Python possible?
- Next message (by thread): Improvements to the Python core (was: Is a "real" C-Python possible?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list