builtin set literal
Steven Bethard
steven.bethard at gmail.com
Wed Feb 21 14:31:52 EST 2007
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Feb 21 14:31:52 EST 2007
- Previous message (by thread): builtin set literal
- Next message (by thread): HTTP_REFERER value
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bearophileHUGS at lycos.com wrote: > Steven Bethard: >> take a look at the current state of tuples: >> 1, 2 >> 1, >> () > > That's not a good situation. I presume the situation/syntax of tuples > in Python 2.x can't be improved. But can it be improved for Py 3.0? I'm not really losing any sleep over the current tuple syntax. ;-) The empty tuple is so uncommon in my code that the fact that it's spelled differently just doesn't bother me. And anyway, if I've learned anything from the Python community over the years, it's that syntax is best left to Guido. ;-) STeVe
- Previous message (by thread): builtin set literal
- Next message (by thread): HTTP_REFERER value
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list