Home Original page

Python compiled on Windows

Duncan Booth duncan.booth at invalid.invalid
Tue Feb 6 03:35:08 EST 2007 
Franz Steinhaeusler <franz.steinhaeusler at gmx.at> wrote:

> @Duncan: Yes, you are not wrong! :)
> But this is not really open source in my opinion.
> Ok there is the VC++ toolkit for download.

Which I agree totally is a real pain finding the right versions to 
download.

> 
> I'm just curious, if there ever had compiled on windows using
> that toolkit or even with gcc, and with gcc, whether there are
> problems or/and differences in speed and run time behaviour.
> 

Yes, people have compiled Python with gcc on windows. I believe it is
slightly slower than the standard release, but I would guess that may
depend on the exact versions of gcc/msc you choose to compare, and the
exact compiler options you choose (or I may even be imagining it
entirely).

As I understand it, you can use Mingw to compile extension modules which
are compatible with the standard release of Python, and of course there
is always cygwin. 

But I still don't understand what difference it makes to anyone between:

an application (could be open or closed source) running on an open
source language (Python) compiled with a closed source compiler on a
closed source OS. 

versus

an application (could be open or closed source) running on an open
source language (Python) compiled with an open source compiler on a
closed source OS. 

at the end of the day you still have a mix of open and closed source
components. If it makes you feel better to be using an open source
compiler that's fine, but it doesn't really do anything for me.
More information about the Python-list mailing list