builtin set literal
Dave Opstad
dave.opstad at monotypeimaging.com
Wed Feb 21 10:41:30 EST 2007
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Feb 21 10:41:30 EST 2007
- Previous message (by thread): builtin set literal
- Next message (by thread): builtin set literal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <7xk5yc7pnj.fsf at ruckus.brouhaha.com>, Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@NOSPAM.invalid> wrote: > [...] However, Python seems to use the -ed suffix for the > non-mutating versions of these functions, e.g. sorted(list) instead > of the mutating list.sort(). I've found this to be useful in my own Python libraries. For instance, a graphic object has move(), scale() etc. methods which mutate, and moved(), scaled() etc. methods which return new instances. It's English-specific, but still mnemonically useful.
- Previous message (by thread): builtin set literal
- Next message (by thread): builtin set literal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list