Collections of non-arbitrary objects ?
Paul Rubin
http
Wed Jun 27 13:37:29 EDT 2007
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Jun 27 13:37:29 EDT 2007
- Previous message (by thread): Collections of non-arbitrary objects ?
- Next message (by thread): Collections of non-arbitrary objects ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> writes: > Think of a tuple as an ordered collection. A given element's ordinal > position indicates its semantics (meaning, significance), and > generally it won't make sense to iterate over the elements of a tuple > (though naturally that doesn't stop people, and neither does the > interpreter). def f(*a): ... is a fundamental language feature and really only makes sense in the context of iterating over tuples.
- Previous message (by thread): Collections of non-arbitrary objects ?
- Next message (by thread): Collections of non-arbitrary objects ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list