Lenard Lindstrom len-l at telus.net
Wed Jun 27 21:28:16 EDT 2007

• Previous message (by thread): Python's "only one way to do it" philosophy isn't good?
• Next message (by thread): Python's "only one way to do it" philosophy isn't good?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Douglas Alan wrote:
> 
> Lispers have long since understood how to write mapping function to
> iterator converters using stack groups or continuations, but Common
> Lisp never mandated stack groups or continuations for conforming
> implementations.  Scheme, of course, has continuations, and there are
> implementations of Common Lisp with stack groups.
> 

Those stack groups

http://common-lisp.net/project/bknr/static/lmman/fd-sg.xml

remind me of Python greenlets

http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/greenlet .


---
Lenard Lindstrom
<len-l at telus.net>

---

• Previous message (by thread): Python's "only one way to do it" philosophy isn't good?
• Next message (by thread): Python's "only one way to do it" philosophy isn't good?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list