Proposal: Decimal literals in Python.
Ben Finney
bignose+hates-spam at benfinney.id.au
Fri Oct 26 19:12:53 EDT 2007
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Oct 26 19:12:53 EDT 2007
- Previous message (by thread): Proposal: Decimal literals in Python.
- Next message (by thread): Proposal: Decimal literals in Python.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Matimus <mccredie at gmail.com> writes: > The trailing L [for 'long' literals] is going away in Python 3.0. Yes. On the other hand, we are gaining '0bNNNN' for binary literals, to go along with '0oNNNN' for octal and '0xNNNN' for hexadecimal. So, the original poster might get further by proposing an '0dNNN.NNN' syntax for 'decimal.Decimal' literals. At least the syntax would be consistent and wouldn't add a new punctuation character to the language... > For your consideration may I suggest a '$' prefix. ... unlike this one. -- \ "The illiterate of the future will not be the person who cannot | `\ read. It will be the person who does not know how to learn." | _o__) -- Alvin Toffler | Ben Finney
- Previous message (by thread): Proposal: Decimal literals in Python.
- Next message (by thread): Proposal: Decimal literals in Python.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list